Uncut footage. This seems to be the hot topic in the climbing world right now. Check out DPM’s latest article, Uncut Footage: The Burden of Proof or a Threat to our Community. To me it seems like such a waste of time. Who really gives a shit if what’s his name lied about climbing a project over there? It comes down to that climber’s morals, which have obviously been twisted long before they humped their way up their first rock.
As an amateur videographer I have shot and edited both types of footage; cut and uncut. Uncut footage is easy to film but boring to watch. Cut footage requires multiple angles and multiple climbing efforts because I usually shoot with one camera. To me it’s simple, be honest. Use the shots you have (whether it’s one uncut shot, or 15 different angles). If the climber has sent the problem I feel that it’s just to use all angles regardless of whether the shot was from the initial send or repeating one move for editing purposes. Just a little rant from yours truly…






Recent Comments